Assistant professor (Guest), Department of Political Science, Mahila College, Khagaria, Munger University, Munger
JournalRPIMJ
Volume / Issue1 / 1
Pages10–20
Published24 Sep 2025
Paper IDRPIMJ11JS25002
Views / Downloads4 / 3
Article summary
Abstract
Indian democracy increasingly confronts the intertwined pressures of ubiquitous social media, the industrialization of fake news, and deepening political polarization. This study synthesizes recent Indian and comparative evidence to map causal pathways linking platform design, incentive structures, and user psychology to downstream civic outcomes. We highlight how algorithmic curation, homophily, and attention economies generate selective exposure, amplify affective polarization, and reward emotionally charged misinformation at scale. Drawing on election periods and everyday discourse, we situate India’s experience within a global landscape while foregrounding distinctive features: multilingual information ecologies, the dominance of mobile-first private messaging, uneven digital literacy, and heterogeneous regulatory capacity. We then evaluate the effectiveness and trade-offs of current responses, including fact-check partnerships, platform moderation, India’s IT Rules, and court-driven remedies, alongside media-literacy initiatives. Finally, we outline a research and policy agenda that prioritizes transparency mandates for recommender systems, interoperable provenance standards, rapid response protocols during high-salience events, and curriculum-embedded critical digital literacy. The paper argues that mitigating polarization without suppressing pluralism requires a layered approach that aligns platform incentives with public interest, strengthens independent institutions, and equips citizens to navigate high-velocity information environments. By integrating insights across communication studies, political science, behavioral science, and technology policy, the study clarifies mechanisms, evaluates evidence, and proposes pragmatic, democratic safeguards suited to India’s scale and diversity. We propose measurement strategies combining audits, trace data, surveys, and field experiments across diverse states.
Keywords
Social mediaFake newsPolitical polarizationIndiaAlgorithmic curationMedia literacyRegulation
Citation record
How to cite this article
Priyanka Singh (2025). Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy. ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 10–20. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy
Priyanka Singh. “Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy.” ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 2025, pp. 10–20. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy
Priyanka Singh. “Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy.” ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal 1, no. 1 (2025): 10–20. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy
Priyanka Singh (2025) ‘Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy’, ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), pp. 10–20. Available at: https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy.
Priyanka Singh, “Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy,” ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2025. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy.
Priyanka Singh. Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy. ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal. 2025;1(1):10–20. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy.
Priyanka Singh. Social Media, Fake News, and Political Polarization: Challenges for Indian Democracy. ResearchPro International Multidisciplinary Journal 2025, 1 (1), 10–20. https://www.researchprojournal.com/article/rpimj11js25002/social-media-fake-news-and-political-polarization-challenges-for-indian-democracy.
No separate funding declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.
Conflict of Interest
No separate conflict-of-interest declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal policy applies.
Ethical Approval
No separate ethical approval statement was available in the verified source record; the article and journal policies apply.
Data Availability
No separate data-availability statement was available in the verified source record; contact the author(s) or editorial office where appropriate.
Author Contributions
No separate author-contribution statement was available in the verified source record; authorship follows the published article record.
AI-use Declaration
No separate AI-use declaration was available in the verified source record; the journal AI-use policy applies.
Editorial record
Publisher's Note
The views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this article are those of the author(s). Publication does not imply endorsement by the journal, editorial board or publisher. Responsibility for accuracy, originality and integrity remains with the author(s). Readers should independently evaluate and verify information before application or citation.
Garimella, K., & Eckles, D. (2020). Images and misinformation in political groups: Evidence from WhatsApp in India. HKS. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-030
Neyazi, T. A., Kalogeropoulos, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Misinformation concerns and online news participation among internet users in India. Social Media + Society, 7(2). Journals. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211009013
Abhishek, A. (2023). The state deputizing citizens to discipline digital news media: The case of the IT Rules 2021 in India. Digital Journalism, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2134163
Agrawal, R. (2018). India connected: How the smartphone is transforming the world’s largest democracy. Oxford University Press. global.oup.com. Source
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. Source
Madan, G. D. (2022). Understanding misinformation in India: The case for a meaningful regulatory approach for social media platforms. arXiv. Source
Sharma, S., Caur, S., Hitkul, & Kumaraguru, P. (2021). Influence of NaMo App on Twitter. arXiv. Source
Alimin, N. G. (2024). The role of social media in forming public opinion from a contemporary sociological perspective. OSF. Source
Udupa, S., Venkatraman, S., & Khan, A. (2020). “Millennial India”: Global digital politics in context. Television & New Media, 21(4), 343–359. Source
Housh, A. M. (2018). Fake news, political narrative, & social media: A structuration approach. SIT Digital Collections. Source
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Gupta, M., Dennehy, D., Parra, C. M., Mäntymäki, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Fake news believability: The effects of political beliefs and espoused cultural values. Information & Management, 60(3), 103745. Source
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN. Source
Alatawi, F., Cheng, L., Tahir, A., Karami, M., Jiang, B., Black, T., & Liu, H. (2021). A survey on echo chambers on social media: Description, detection and mitigation. arXiv. Source
Jiang, B., Karami, M., Cheng, L., Black, T., & Liu, H. (2021). Mechanisms and attributes of echo chambers in social media. arXiv. Source
Gandini, A., Gerosa, A., Gobbo, B., Keeling, S., Leonini, L., Mosca, L., Orofino, M., Reviglio, U., & Splendore, S. (2022). The algorithmic public opinion: A literature review. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/m6zn8
Eccles, D. A., & Dingler, T. (2021). Three prophylactic interventions to counter fake news on social media. arXiv. Source
Ekwueme, M. C., & Folarin, S. F. (2017). Role of social media in electioneering: The case of the Nigerian 2015 presidential election. CUCEN 2017, Covenant University. Source
Raman, R., Kumar Nair, V., Nedungadi, P., Kumar Sahu, A., Kowalski, R., Ramanathan, S., & Achuthan, K. (2024). Fake news research trends, linkages to generative artificial intelligence and sustainable development goals. Heliyon, 10(3), e24727. Source
